> On Dec 27, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> > wrote: > > The main thing I worry about is that there are standard conventions > that we're missing from other language families. Would someone mind > investigating a few other, popular languages
FWIW Racket's own `~r` function already accepts radixes (radices? radishes?) up to 36. Personally I'm a fan of base 62 (used in short-URL generators, such as that employed by beautifulracket.com <http://beautifulracket.com/>). [1] https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/strings.html?q=~x#%28def._%28%28lib._racket%2Fformat..rkt%29._~7er%29%29 <https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/strings.html?q=~x#(def._((lib._racket/format..rkt)._~7er))> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
