On Thursday, December 29, 2016 at 5:54:08 PM UTC-5, gustavo wrote: > I'm not too worried about a x4 slowdown in number->string because I > don't expect it to be in a tight loop, but it would be nice that it > were faster.
In fact, I find number->string already a tad slow, because I do use it in a loop. Anyway, I don't want to complain about speed down the road without mentioning now that I would consider any 4x slowdown unpleasant. A base-10 user, JG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
