> On Feb 20, 2017, at 2:27 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
> Maybe that's true, but I haven't wanted to do that in my Racket code
> using either `check-expect` in class or `check-equal` in Rackunit (or
> at least, not enough to define a new abstraction for it). Have you
> tried making a testing framework to accommodate this better?

I have wanted this, and have done this, many times. But I will say that it 
doesn’t come that easy in Racket either. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to