At Sat, 8 Feb 2020 17:46:06 +0100, Bertrand Augereau wrote: > You're right, but wouldn't using the posix_spawn family have better > semantics, better performance, and would allow to unify between POSIX and > Windows behaviours nicely ? :)
It's the usual problem: posix_spawn() doesn't quite support all of the things Racket does between fork() and exec(). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/5e3ee899.1c69fb81.a3dd4.306bSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com.
