At Sat, 8 Feb 2020 17:46:06 +0100, Bertrand Augereau wrote:
> You're right, but wouldn't using the posix_spawn family have better
> semantics, better performance, and would allow to unify between POSIX and
> Windows behaviours nicely ? :)

It's the usual problem: posix_spawn() doesn't quite support all of the
things Racket does between fork() and exec().

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/5e3ee899.1c69fb81.a3dd4.306bSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com.

Reply via email to