Hello Christian - My assumption was that your users would be primarily in RADMIN, and if not there then in LDAP?
Perhaps you could clarify? More detail on exactly what you are trying to accomplish would be helpful. regards Hugh > On 19 Jan 2019, at 10:44, Christian Meutes <christ...@errxtx.net> wrote: > > Hi Hugh, > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 12:12 AM Hugh Irvine <h...@open.com.au> wrote: > >> <Handler …..> >> >> AuthByPolicy ContinueWhileIgnore >> >> <AuthBy GROUP> >> >> AuthByPolicy ContinueUntilAccept >> >> <AuthBy RADMIN> >> ….. >> </AuthBy> >> >> <AuthBy LDAP2> >> ….. >> </AuthBy> >> >> </AuthBy> >> >> <AuthBy INTERNAL> >> ….. >> </AuthBy> >> >> </Handler> > > hmmm ... I believe the "Reject" in Radmin, when a user is found but > explicitely denied by check-items, wouldn't be possible with this. Or > am I wrong? > > Thanks, > -- > Christian > > PGP Fingerprint: B458 E4D6 7173 A8C4 9C75315B 709C 295B FA53 2318 > Toulouser Allee 21, 40211 Duesseldorf, Germany -- Hugh Irvine h...@open.com.au Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald, Platypus, Freeside, TACACS+, PAM, external, Active Directory, EAP, TLS, TTLS, PEAP, TNC, WiMAX, RSA, Vasco, Yubikey, MOTP, HOTP, TOTP, DIAMETER, SIM, etc. Full source on Unix, Linux, Windows, macOS, Solaris, VMS, NetWare etc. _______________________________________________ radiator mailing list radiator@lists.open.com.au https://lists.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator
