section entitled : The Corner
 
National Review Online
 
 
_Ron  Paul on Those Newsletters He Didn’t Know About_ 
(http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/286519/ron-paul-those-newsletters-he-didnt-know-about-jonah-
goldberg)  
_December  22, 2011 8:36 A.M._ 
(http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/286519/ron-paul-those-newsletters-he-didnt-know-about-jonah-goldberg)
  
By _Jonah  Goldberg_ (http://www.nationalreview.com/author/56454)    
(http://twitter.com/JonahNRO)    (mailto:[email protected])    
(http://www.nationalreview.com/author/56454/bio) 

 
He sounds like he was involved.  Around 1:55.

Re :  Video clip provided in original
 
---------------------------------------
 
     
RHN
: 12/22/11 17:54
 
The National Review has some gall feigning moral outrage over Ron  Paul's 
racist newsletters in light of its own scandalous history as a  bi-weekly 
racist newsletter.  
While the racial statements in Dr. Paul's newsletters are disgusting  (and 
perfectly inconsistent with his unassailable 30-year record as a  champion 
of minorities), they pale in comparison with the blatant and  atrocious 
racism that pervaded the National Review for decades, published  by the great W
illiam F. Buckley himself: 
"In the Deep South the Negroes are retarded. Any effort to ignore the  fact 
is sentimentalism or demagoguery. In the Deep South the essential  
relationship is organic, and the attempt to hand over to the Negro the raw  
political power with which to alter it is hardly a solution." 
SOURCE: National Review, August 1957 
"The central question ... is whether the White community in the South  is 
entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically  and 
culturally, in areas in which it does not predominate numerically? The  
sobering answer is Yes–the White community is so entitled because, for the  
time 
being, it is the advanced race." 
SOURCE: National Review, March 1960 
"MLK Day would be far preferable on the first Monday in September, for  
undeniably one of Mr. King's central achievements was to open the door to  the 
marketplace for jobs. Somehow, though, it rankles that we should be  asked 
to take the day off to remember a man whose career was built on  leisure. The 
GNP, after all, is not produced by people marching in the  streets. Perhaps 
MLK Day should be celebrated only by the gainfully  employed, and all those 
on welfare should be required to collect their  checks as usual." 
SOURCE: National Review, October, 1983 
"Where Mandela belongs, in his current frame of mind, is precisely  where 
he is: in jail." 
SOURCE: National Review, September, 1985 
What say you, Goldberg: does your association with a racist newsletter  
disqualify you as a conservative thinker and human being? Will you take  
responsibility for your indiscretion and resign from the National Review?  Will 
you burn W.F. Buckley for a  witch?

 
 
--------------------------------------
 
     
  (http://www.nationalreview.com/comments-policy)  
(http://www.nationalreview.com/comments-policy) _MReed53_ 
(http://www.nationalreview.com/user/12043/comments) 
: 12/22/11 15:46
 
Why would anyone have ever doubted Paul was involved with the  newsletter? 
It was published under his name, with his approval and with  him listed as 
its editor. The taped interview just confirms the obvious.  The genuine Paul 
apostles don't give a rat's behind about the facts.  They're going to defend 
him under any circumstances regardless of any  evidence, even as they 
concoct conspiracy theories about and assign dark,  but hidden beliefs and 
designs to every other candidate. That's fine.  About five-percent or so of any 
major party consists of people so nuts  they could serve as minor decorations 
on a Carmen Miranda hat.
The more  frightening thing is that he should be pulling around 20 percent 
in Iowa  and 10 percent or better in the national polls. That means a larger 
 segment of the GOP vote than I would care to contemplate is either  
hunky-dory with a candidate who consorts with 9-11 truthers and other  sick, 
wack-jobs, or is absymally unaware of the man's poisonous  associations, 
published swill and truly disturbing past statements and  actions. It is good 
to see 
that conservative media is finally, and  belatedly, beginning to do the due 
diligence is should have done all  along. But it is also an indictment of 
the media in general --  particularly debate moderators and questioners -- 
that they did not  confront Paul 

 
--------------------------------------------------------------
 
     
Upstream
: 12/22/11 10:07
 
Each day, I learn more about RP and am amazed at how large a following  he 
has and why the media has not been more diligent in vetting this  candidate. 
The letters are a problem, whether he wrote them or not, was he  the 
editor? There is much more that concerns me, today I read at Hot Air  that RP 
endorsed Cynthia McKinney in 2008? Really? Should any candidate be  taken 
seriously who exercises that kind of judgment. 
"Cynthia McKinney is also next door to being a communist in terms of  her 
domestic policy. McKinney is an open and avowed enemy of free market  
capitalism, preferring instead Ghadaffi-style socialism. Seriously, she  
literally 
and openly favors dictatorial socialism. McKinney ran on the  Green Party 
ticket, whose platform explicitly includes guaranteed  open-ended welfare (at 
a living wage) for everyone regardless of their  ability or willingness to 
work, among other quasi-communist and far-left  economic policies"
_External Link_ 
(http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/21/quotes-of-the-day-894/)   
(http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/21/quotes-of-the-day-894/)  
Apparently RP has been a frequent guest on the Alex Jones radio show,  
surely there must be some audio of interest to voters. How close are the  ties 
between RP and Alex Jones, perhaps none but please media do your  homework, 
the Chicago Machine will... 
Oh, and what other old video is out there, here's some old RP debate  
footage on the issue of legalizing drugs, glad he has toned down his tone  but 
he 
comes across as completely unhinged 
------------------------------------- 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to