In the spirit of 'right tools for the job' I would suggest using Wordpress for your blog.
It has an awesome CMS and I've found it to be very reliable over the years. Writing a blog engine is a fun weekend project, but I wouldn't run my blog on someones weekend project. - Mike On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Torm3nt <[email protected]> wrote: > > hahaha > > Yeah there seems to be an issue with passenger, with all passenger > processes sitting at around 22% =\ > > Trying to figure out what's going on there, as that's definitely not cool. > hehe > > Have reset the processes and restarted apache numerous times, doesn't > seem to be resolving the issue. > > > Cheers, > > Kirk > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Julio Cesar Ody <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> By the way, Kirk, it seems your blog doesn't scale. Requests are >> timing out both from where I am and my VM in the Soviet States of >> America. >> >> Must be Rails. Rewrite it in Scala. >> >> *ducks* >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Torm3nt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Cheers for your input Dr Nic, >>> >>> I wasn't actually specifically targeting rails - rails 3.0 certainly >>> looks to be much more enticing as far as frameworks goes as you'll be >>> able to plug and play various libraries together, but not many >>> frameworks do this =P >>> >>> >>> Kirk >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dr Nic Williams <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> People talk about "rails doesn't scale" and mean performance. What I love >>>> about Rails is that scales for the size of the project. You can start a >>>> micro project today, and it easily evolves into a bigger project. >>>> The single-file-contains-my-app frameworks aren't wrong or broken; rather >>>> they take away one of the oft-forgotten but awesome aspects of Rails: you >>>> and I both know where our next model or controller is going to go. The >>>> generators know it. The IDEs/editors know it. >>>> The heavy-weightedness of Rails will probably become optional as we move to >>>> 3.0 and beyond. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Torm3nt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey all! >>>>> >>>>> I've recently been musing over the use of heavy frameworks (such as >>>>> RoR) and how I'm beginning to see (in some cases) them being overused, >>>>> mostly for the wrong purposes. In one instance I witnessed a Rails >>>>> application for getting reports on a database. >>>>> >>>>> I've written my thoughts on this and would love to hear from some of >>>>> the more intelligent people in this community, either of their own >>>>> experiences or even a counter-argument =) >>>>> >>>>> http://www.kirkbushell.com/articles/using-the-right-tool-for-the-job >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Kirk Bushell >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr Nic Williams >>>> Mocra - Premier iPhone and Ruby on Rails Consultants >>>> w - http://mocra.com >>>> twitter - @drnic >>>> skype - nicwilliams >>>> e - [email protected] >>>> p - +61 412 002 126 or +61 7 3102 3237 >>>> >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> > >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
