Server should be a bit more responsive now - reduced the Poolsize of
the spawn servers to 2 (default 6). Only have 256mb ram on that slice,
so it got chewed up pretty quickly - should be better now =)

@ Mike:

I use wordpress for torm3nt.com, mephisto for kirkbushell.com - both
of which I find easy to use, but I actually prefer mephisto - it's
simpler, for one - and I got to look at how someone else uses their
Rails framework, plus it was also used as a test case to setup my own
server.etc, and learn from it (as was just demonstrated. heh)


Cheers,

Kirk


On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Mike Bailey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> In the spirit of 'right tools for the job' I would suggest using
> Wordpress for your blog.
>
> It has an awesome CMS and I've found it to be very reliable over the years.
>
> Writing a blog engine is a fun weekend project, but I wouldn't run my
> blog on someones weekend project.
>
> - Mike
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Torm3nt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> hahaha
>>
>> Yeah there seems to be an issue with passenger, with all passenger
>> processes sitting at around 22% =\
>>
>> Trying to figure out what's going on there, as that's definitely not cool. 
>> hehe
>>
>> Have reset the processes and restarted apache numerous times, doesn't
>> seem to be resolving the issue.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Kirk
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Julio Cesar Ody <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> By the way, Kirk, it seems your blog doesn't scale. Requests are
>>> timing out both from where I am and my VM in the Soviet States of
>>> America.
>>>
>>> Must be Rails. Rewrite it in Scala.
>>>
>>> *ducks*
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Torm3nt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Cheers for your input Dr Nic,
>>>>
>>>> I wasn't actually specifically targeting rails - rails 3.0 certainly
>>>> looks to be much more enticing as far as frameworks goes as you'll be
>>>> able to plug and play various libraries together, but not many
>>>> frameworks do this =P
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kirk
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dr Nic Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> People talk about "rails doesn't scale" and mean performance. What I love
>>>>> about Rails is that scales for the size of the project. You can start a
>>>>> micro project today, and it easily evolves into a bigger project.
>>>>> The single-file-contains-my-app frameworks aren't wrong or broken; rather
>>>>> they take away one of the oft-forgotten but awesome aspects of Rails: you
>>>>> and I both know where our next model or controller is going to go. The
>>>>> generators know it. The IDEs/editors know it.
>>>>> The heavy-weightedness of Rails will probably become optional as we move 
>>>>> to
>>>>> 3.0 and beyond.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Torm3nt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey all!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've recently been musing over the use of heavy frameworks (such as
>>>>>> RoR) and how I'm beginning to see (in some cases) them being overused,
>>>>>> mostly for the wrong purposes. In one instance I witnessed a Rails
>>>>>> application for getting reports on a database.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've written my thoughts on this and would love to hear from some of
>>>>>> the more intelligent people in this community, either of their own
>>>>>> experiences or even a counter-argument =)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.kirkbushell.com/articles/using-the-right-tool-for-the-job
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kirk Bushell
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dr Nic Williams
>>>>> Mocra - Premier iPhone and Ruby on Rails Consultants
>>>>> w - http://mocra.com
>>>>> twitter - @drnic
>>>>> skype - nicwilliams
>>>>> e - [email protected]
>>>>> p - +61 412 002 126 or +61 7 3102 3237
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>> >
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
or Rails Oceania" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to