Oh, it's also worth pointing out http://whichrubycmsshouldiuse.com/
for a fairly brief yet relatively and most importantly modern overview
of adva, browser and radiant.

On Jan 22, 8:30 pm, Sutto <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've built a (relatively simple - 3 models and a controller on top of
> the built in stuff) site on top
> of Refinery and found it generally very easy to use. Documentation was
> a bit of the pain in the ass
> and the structure of it (gem version with refinery as an engine in
> that which you require) is annoying
> at best when you're looking for something specific (although, ack
> makes all that simple - but that's
> not the point) but on the whole doing stuff is simple. You can get
> away quite easily with just theming
> the existing stuff, writing your own front end controllers as you
> normally would and then using the
> generated admin backend (by default it generates a scaffoldy style
> admin section) as a starting point
> / reference to add everything else.
>
> In other words, I liked it - more than any of the other rails cms'
> I've played with - but it still has
> a few annoying warts.
>
> On Jan 20, 5:57 pm, Nicholas Faiz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yeh, I haven't used Refinery yet, but I think there's still a hole in
> > the CMS space for an app which grasps how to do the basics well but
> > remain easy to extend. I'll check out Refinery at some stage (it's a
> > pity they confuse documentation with videos). If anyone has used
> > Refinery I'd be interested in hearing about how easy it is to extend -
> > a good CMS should use a Rails friendly approach (engines) to allow you
> > to plug new features into its framework.
>
> > In the interim BrowserCMS is very strong.
>
> > No one wants to code a Drupal replacement in the Ruby world, but most
> > coders would like to find one!
>
> > > On Jan 20, 2:31 pm, kirillrdy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi,
>
> > > > Just want to ask people what Rails based CMS they use,
>
> > > > I've tried just about anything there is, and I dont feel very happy
> > > > with any of them.
>
> > > > Out of all the ones I've tested top 2 are Radiant and BrowserCMS.
>
> > > > Radiant is simple, but sometimes even simples things are so hard to do
> > > > in Radiant. Almost all extensions are old and broken, And worst of all
> > > > it would be hard to teach a non teach client to use it.
>
> > > > BrowserCMS was meant to be much better, I like how easy it is to
> > > > integrate browserCMS with any rails app.
> > > > But interface is so hard to use, its slow, its fat ( some people say
> > > > it swaps on 256 vps )
> > > > BrowsersCMS caching is crazy and of course lack of documentation, all
> > > > official guides say "To be completed"
>
> > > I agree with most of the above (though I don't think performance is
> > > that bad).
> > > I was going to go with Radiant until BrowserCMS came along, and after
> > > completing one project (http://tcaproject.org) and with another 3 on
> > > the way I'm enjoying BrowserCMS.
> > > Its main strengths are that it looks good for clients, provides a
> > > WYSIWYG and in-place editing style (CKEditor is coming), and is well
> > > integrated into Rails. I especially like how it handles custom
> > > content
> > > types, so you can easily generate content types that fit the
> > > customers
> > > business, and automatically get a CRUD interface for them to use.
> > > There are some useability warts, and the lack of thumbnails in the
> > > admin list of images bugs me, but it is moving forward faster than
> > > Radiant, and there is an actual company behind it.
>
> > > Performance wise I run it with a few other low traffic sites on a
> > > Linode
> > > 384MB with REE and Passenger and its fine. I don't think it has been
> > > very
> > > optimised for performance yet, and most things are addressable by the
> > > developer eg. X-Sendfile aupport. Its just Ruby and Rails - use the
> > > custom module feature and/or monkey patch away!
>
> > > Cheers,
>
> > > Gary

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
or Rails Oceania" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.

Reply via email to