1) script.aculo.us will always depend on Prototype 2) Yes, the votes don't count :)
Best, Thomas
Am 20.07.2006 um 00:16 schrieb Ryan Gahl: My vote is against removing it, if any votes are being counted here, which I don't think they are.
On 7/19/06, Tom Gregory < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Sounds like a vote to remove the prototype dependency from
scriptaculous. I'm in favor for all sorts of reasons.
A clean separation obviates any the-owner-doesn't-participate-anymore-
style discussions. I want to be able to trim the file size by
removing unused functions. I want my developers to be able to
understand it without learning the new syntax. I don't want to have
to suffer the slowdown introduced by some of the syntactic sugar.
TAG
On Jul 19, 2006, at 4:03 PM, Peter Michaux wrote:
> Prototype.js tries to make _javascript_ like Ruby. That is unnecessary
> as _javascript_ is a fully capable language of it's own. <snip>
>
> <snip>
>
> For example, I virtually rewrote the scriptaculous drag and drop
> library to clean it up and fix about 15 tickets total. The whole thing
> deadended because I couldn't take the punishment that Prototype.js was
> giving to me daily.
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> Rails-spinoffs mailing list
> Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
_______________________________________________
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
_______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list
-- Thomas Fuchs wollzelle
questentier on AIM madrobby on irc.freenode.net
|
_______________________________________________
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
