Also it seems that I completely overlooked where it said, "We've already documented all of prototype and would love to get it in."

That sounds like a big deal to me. Seems like every time I turn around someone is complaining about the lack of documentation. How can we help them get it into SVN and published? Perhaps Thomas can help?

On 7/20/06, Brandon Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone else actually tried out this IDE Aptana (http://www.aptana.com/)? You know ... the reason this thread was started.

Looks pretty interesting; however, I'm a TextMate fanatic and ever since have immediately had doubts about other editors. I might try it out later on today if I can find the time.

On 7/20/06, Peter Michaux < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/20/06, Alex Duffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> This is a list for those who WANT to use prototype.

With Rails in the name of this mailing list, Prototype.js being in
Rails svn and Prototype.js's direct integration in Rails core, this is
also an appropriate place to discuss the future connection of
Prototype.js and Rails. I am concerned about the long term success of
Rails not Prototype.js.
_______________________________________________
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs


_______________________________________________
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs

Reply via email to