Sorry - chris.
At 04:11 PM 29/08/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Was this to Chris or Clint
>
>"Clint,
>
>They are not tough questions - they are silly questions..."
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Victor Zalakos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:10 PM
>To: Gist, Kelly; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [RR] Question Chris' response
>
>
>At 09:37 AM 29/08/2001 -0500, Gist, Kelly wrote:
> >Victor, if you are praying about this and questions are running through
>your
> >mind, here are some to ask yourself:
> >
> >As a credentialed pastor would you stand before your congregation and
> >unashamedly read every word of "Harry Potter"?
> >
> >Next: Would you stand before God in the throne room and His Son and read
> >"Harry Potter"?
> >
> >These are tough questions, but I'm really not "throwing the first stone".
>
>---
>
>Clint,
>
>They are not tough questions - they are silly questions...
>
>Why would I waste a congregations time who have come to worship God and be
>taught from his word, reading a child's novel to them?
>
>Why would I waste my own time in the presence of God reading him a child's
>novel - when I would be wanting to throw myself at his feet in worship and
>adoration?
>
>Try to stick to the point - and not bring up red herrings all the time. Why
>is it when people feel that they are loosing an argument that they broaden
>the scope so wide - that it become impossible to continue the discussion.
>
>I've had enough of this thread.
>
>If you haven't read the book - don't comment.
>At best you are only propogating anothers opinion - at worst lies and
>slander.
>
>If you have read the book - don't bother commenting.
>No one here is prepared to listen to anything that is first hand or factual
>in anyway :)
>
>By the way - I loved the way you popped a little quoted scripture [out of
>context of course] into the last line of your post. Nice touch!
>
>
>
>- JENKENS & GILCHRIST E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE -
>This transmission may be: (1) subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege, (2)
>an attorney work product, or (3) strictly confidential. If you are not the
>intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or
>disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please
>reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized
>interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law.
_______
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe rangernet" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit http://rangernet.org/subscribe.htm
http://rangernet.org Autoresponder: [EMAIL PROTECTED]