I could be wrong but I have been taught that the responisbility for Royal Ranger training standards resides at the District level. Each district is required by the National Office to produce a set of policies and procedures that are then approved by the National Office.
I learned this at the Southern California Distric Instructors' Certification Seminar where I received my Training Chief pin for SA/Buckaroo's. As far as standards go don't you think that say the Latin American District might be better qualified to develope their own training standards than say the District office? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Edward Christiansen Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 4:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [RR] Standards for training A good question. I think the issue finds its root in the pride of humanity. It does get us in trouble. If we were to be very honest, How about we deal with the real issue of submission to authority? That is the crux of this issue. Jonathan Trower wrote: > > With the discussion about training that has been going on for the past few > days, I would like to explore the issue of standards a little further. > > Some on the list appear to desire the flexibility in the national training > program to customize things to fit their local situation (in other words, > they may feel that their district is different, and therefore their > training program needs to vary from the national training program). > > I wonder what a district commander or district training coordinator would > say if an individual certified instructor, or even a section, said: "the > commanders in our section are so different from the rest of the district > because we are in a(n) urban/rural/large/small/rich/poor area (or we are in > the north/south/east/west/central part of the district) that we need to be > able to train them our own way." > > I suspect, based on the districts I've been in and have worked with, that > many districts would insist that the instructors follow the standards that > the district has established -- is this true? Why is that any different > than the national office desiring each district to follow the standards > that have been established at the national level for training like the LTC? > After all, the LTC is a national training program, just like NTC, ANTC, > BSTC/RKTC, etc., isn't it? > > Just wondering. > > Jonathan > > _______ > Let the Golden Rule be your daily rule. > > Please pray for your list sponsor: http://eBible.org/mpj/ > > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe rangernet" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > or visit http://rangernet.org/subscribe.htm > http://rangernet.org _______ Let the Golden Rule be your daily rule. Please pray for your list sponsor: http://eBible.org/mpj/ To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe rangernet" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit http://rangernet.org/subscribe.htm http://rangernet.org _______ Let the Golden Rule be your daily rule. Please pray for your list sponsor: http://eBible.org/mpj/ To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe rangernet" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit http://rangernet.org/subscribe.htm http://rangernet.org
