Soaring Golden Eagle wrote:
>
>
> >Further- In our cuurent AG fellowship, has a traditional
> >understanding or support of Royal Rangers become eroded
> >by affluence?
>
> I'm not going to touch this one, even with a 3-meter pole!
>
> A better question might be: "How do we stir up more understanding and
> support of Royal Rangers?" That is a more constructive question. The first
> step to the answer is in prayer.
*I agree.. about Prayer..
But frankly Royal Ranger support is second to doing right by the boys!
*If we say that any boy can become President or Att'y General, do
we also teach that the Red points can be 'sanded down to fit the
mainstream political world?
So how do we explain the agreement Mr.Ashcroft has made?
*To me as a pragmitist, I suggest we not make the boys anymore
responsible for the Ranger doctrine than what they choose later
in life for their ethic! They may take another path than traditional
AG church, and as long as they love the Lord *That's fine<G>
As they become affluent, they may become educated at Liberal
institutions
*like YALE where instruction or social standing is linked to a more
mainstream
generic gospel. *perhaps we should merge with a group such as
"Promisekeepers"
and work to bring unity among churches who needs a good generic
Christian
boys group, and transfer AG doctrine to the AG version of the "God and
Country"
award?
*That would increase our exposure and fuel growth!
-=A=-
_______
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe rangernet" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit http://rangernet.org/subscribe.htm
http://rangernet.org Autoresponder: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
