> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, 17 June 2009 8:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: RAT with BuildBot at Apache > > Gavin wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Robert Burrell Donkin > [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Wednesday, 17 June 2009 6:34 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: RAT with BuildBot at Apache > > > > <snip> > > > > Of those 9 licenses > > > > Empty.txt, notjavadoc.html, bad.txt, src.txt -- are all intentionally > not > > licensed and are there as examples. > > > > So that leaves us with 5 possible 'real' contenders in RAT for license > > problems. > > > > BUILD.txt - I don't see why we can't add a licence header here, others > do. > > > > src/main/java/org/apache/rat/report/claim/ClaimStatistic.java > > > > > src/main/java/org/apache/rat/report/claim/impl/AbstractClaimReporter.java > > > > src/main/java/org/apache/rat/report/claim/impl/ClaimAggregator.java > > > > src/test/resources/elements/Source.java > > > > All those look like genuine contenders to have licences added. > > > > Shall I attach a patch somewhere for those 5 ? > > +1 > > <snip>
Done, patch attached to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-62 sorry for delay. Gav... > > - robert >
