On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Gary Funck wrote:

> 1) The general consensus on the Spamassassin Talk e-mail list was to "use
> Razor2", but the installation documentation is a little light on how to find it
> and install it. From the installation notes,
> http://www.spamassassin.org/dist/INSTALL:
> 
>  - Razor      http://razor.sourceforge.net/
> 
>     Used to check message signatures against Vipul's Razor collaborative
>     filtering network.  Razor is not available from CPAN -- you have to
>     download it from the URL above.
> 
>     Razor has a large number of dependencies on CPAN modules.  Feel free
>     to skip installing it, if this makes you nervous; SpamAssassin will
>     still work well without it.
> 
> (I should add that my reason for trying Razor is that although SA does a great
> job of diagnosing most SPAM, I was hoping for better coverage on the marginal
> spam's that come through, and to take advantage of black-listing based upon
> consensus.)

I'm not sure how you'd expect Razor to work better on "marginal 
spams"...Razor basically is a check against (as well as a reporting 
process to add to) a database of reported/known spam messages.  If the 
message isn't in the Razor database, Razor won't report it as such, and 
SpamAssassin won't add the RAZOR2_CHECK score to the message's spam level.

If you're sure it's spam, however, you can run it through either 
"spamassassin -r" or "razor-report" to have it added to the database.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts
on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now
for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664
http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users

Reply via email to