On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Gary Funck wrote: > Just curious - why isn't Razor2 implemented as a better/faster upgrade from > Razor1? Are there incompatibilities? Is the user base so large that they > couldn't be converted over to Razor2 in a not-too-painful fashion? I found > the Razor1 (actually, it's just called Mail::Audit::Razor on CPAN, or is > that simply a front-end to Razor?) and Razor2 distinction to be confusing.
It's really a reimplementation...different protocols, and different servers. The razor1 servers, as I recall from conversations I believe I read, here, are going to be retired, in favor of the Razor2 service. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
