On Nov 29 Steve Price wrote: >On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 11:13:06PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: >> >> razor'd by whom? Should not sf lists be filtered by razor in the first place? > >It could have been razor'd either by razor running on the recipient's >machine or by sourceforge. It really doesn't matter. The point was
er.. to be razored by SF one would like a feature which doesn't exist. The Aggregator, which "will be released with the next major release of Razor2 agents" (ha ha), is required for efficient deployment of Razor on an MTA (which is surely where it belongs--let the MTA do the network traffic and add an "X-Razor-Warning" header once per message, so that your .procmailrc or Sieve script (or whatever) can perform very simple checks). I am becoming more and more convinced that the Aggregator will never exist. I am happy to test whatever does exist, but in the past when I have offered I've just been told something along the lines of "don't worry, it will be released really soon". So I didn't worry. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
