Re: [Razor-users] Re: >>14.9 MILLION EMAIL ADDRESSES...PLUS $2,000 WORTH OF FREE EMAIL MARKETING SOFTWARE!

[Craig Hughes]

SpamAssassin effectively daemonizes razor if you use spamc/spamd -- Razor is pre-loaded along with all the other bits of perl which SA uses, and then at runtime the only thing fork/exec'd is a lightweight C process. If you run one of the spamc-like milters, it doesn't even need to do that step...

C

On Sunday, December 1, 2002, at 01:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Nov 30 Steve Price wrote:

an MTA (which is surely where it belongs--let the MTA do the network
traffic and add an "X-Razor-Warning" header once per message, so that your
.procmailrc or Sieve script (or whatever) can perform very simple checks).

If you need this then why wait for The Aggregator?  Use something
that already exists.  Maybe I'm missing your point but I do something
very similar With postfix via a content_filter.  With sendmail it is
called a milter.  There's probably equivalents in exim, qmail, ... as

milters etc are designed to be lightweight. Invoking perl for every
incoming message is not something I'd call lightweight!

Maybe I'm mistaken, and someone has daemonised razor while I wasn't
looking--but then that would I presume be called the Aggregator.

-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users