On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 11:43:28PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>> razor'd by whom? Should not sf lists be filtered by razor in the first place? >> >>It could have been razor'd either by razor running on the recipient's >>machine or by sourceforge. It really doesn't matter. The point was > > er.. to be razored by SF one would like a feature which doesn't exist. > > The Aggregator, which "will be released with the next major release of > Razor2 agents" (ha ha), is required for efficient deployment of Razor on > an MTA (which is surely where it belongs--let the MTA do the network > traffic and add an "X-Razor-Warning" header once per message, so that your > .procmailrc or Sieve script (or whatever) can perform very simple checks).
If you need this then why wait for The Aggregator? Use something that already exists. Maybe I'm missing your point but I do something very similar With postfix via a content_filter. With sendmail it is called a milter. There's probably equivalents in exim, qmail, ... as well. -steve ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
