Bob Apthorpe wrote: > False positives are due to honest mistakes (fat-fingered the report > key), ignorance (automated reporting and spamtraps), and malice.
Also due to differing user perceptions. If I received a copy of the EFF newsletter in my mailbox, without having subscribed to it, I would consider it spam, and report it to Razor. The exact same collection of bytes, when delivered to someone else's mailbox wouldn't be spam, as they requested the information. I reckon this can account for a large number of the false positives I personally see in Razor. Advertising mails from companies which I have opted-into, but which other users may have received without opt-in. All I can do is revoke, and see whose trust is hit -- Mine, or the reporters'. rOD. -- He gave his life for tourism. >> Doing the blogging thang again at http://www.groovymother.com/ << ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
