On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 12:32:16AM -0800, John Andersen wrote:
# Fact: Razor2 has a less than 15% detection rate when used alone.
I'm sorry, but this is where you are completely, provably, undeniably 100% wrong.
razor2-agents has a poor detection rate. We all know that, and it is something that bothers both Vipul and myself considerably. That is a client-side issue with that package of software.
Razor2, which is also known as SpamNet and refers to the service which remains open and free, has a ~95% detection rate within a 1st standard deviation of all currently registered users.
Could you explain what a "registered users" means?
I am under the impression that I am registered in that I am capable of reporting spam back to Razor2. But I'm pretty sure that is not the same meaning as you have used here.
I'm also interested in knowing what the issues might be that contribute to a poor detection rate.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297 _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
