On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, 12:12pm (-0600), Bob Proulx wrote: > People will instead on their own "improve the system" by submitting > machine catagorized spam even though that it is specifically stated > not to do that. Sigh. Is it because they are just too stupid to be a > contributing part of the community at large?
I think it's more like people speeding on the Interstate. It's not that they're stupid (or hardened criminals), it's just that they view the rule (or law) as a pointless impediment to getting the job done (filtering spam vs. getting somewhere). After all, who wants to have to read all that damned spam (and we're not talking about 5 or 6 messages a day here, either) when you've got this nifty tool that can read it, categorize it, delete it, AND report it without you having to even bother with it? -- Edward Hennis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ http://www.vaxer.net/~eah |\ /| If you can't be a good example, then | O | you'll just have to be a horrible warning. |/_\| -Catherine Aird- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297 _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
