Thomas Jarosch wrote: > Hello together, > > I've been using Razor and SpamAssassin quite a while now > using the standard rules distributed with SpamAssassin. > > SpamAssassin normally evalutes Razor's spam confidence level > between 51% and 100%. This results in the following score: > > RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, > RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100=1.5, > RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5, > RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5 > > -> 4 points at maximum. > > I'm wondering if it would make sense to add additional rules for 95% to 100% > spam confidence? Is anybody already using a setup like that? Any drawbacks?
You can try it if you like. The existing rules are the result of some testing that was done several years ago. I think it was Theo that did it.. Regardless, last time I looked I found that e8 tends to strongly gravitate towards 100, if its listed. There are some hits below 100, but they're comparatively rare. This is probably due to really fast prorogation of reports for this signature type. I just re-tweaked my Core.pm to make cf comparison logging a lower-level event so I can check if this has changed. So far (only a minute or two) I've gotten 5 e8's and 1 e4, all cf=100. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
