On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 01:11:53PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > You can try it if you like. The existing rules are the result of some testing > that was done several years ago. I think it was Theo that did it..
Yeah, I wrote the rules + code way back when... I've been trying to find some stats for this stuff, but didn't come up with anything useful. My recollection was that w/ e8 the cf was either really low or really high, and we just took the 51_100 values from the older pre-e8 rules and made it all consistent. I don't recall e4 stats. > I just re-tweaked my Core.pm to make cf comparison logging a lower-level > event > so I can check if this has changed. So far (only a minute or two) I've gotten > 5 > e8's and 1 e4, all cf=100. Yeah, unfortunately we don't log the actual cf values anywhere by default, so it's hard to runs some stats w/out rerunning all messages and pounding on the razor servers. We have the NetCache plugin which was an initial attempt I was working on to grab all network-related test results and store them in an X-Spam-* header for later use via the --reuse option, but a) Razor2 is the only thing in there, and b) no one enables it by default since nothing actually uses the resulting header. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: "... are you nuts? Well, yeah, I got references ..." - Prof. Michaelson
pgpntMbb5RYZ2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
