Medical/Legal was a niche that WP Dominated.  WP corp wrote many, many macros to suit 
the needs of
those industries.  Both Lawfirms I still service, use WP for this reason.  The main 
point I was
trying to expose was there is nothing hidden in word that needs revealing that I can 
think of at the
moment.  I will agree that after using WP for several years, it was not an immediate 
or easy
transition to Word, as I had a great dependence on "reveal codes".  At this point, I 
get along
without them and don't see how it would change the operation of Word as it is 
currently structured.




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bernie Corrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 1:29 PM
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Off topic


> Mike -
>
>         I'm aware that in Word you can put the cursor somewhere in a
> document, look up at the tool bar, and see what the current font, etc, are.
> I quite often need to see the whole picture, not just a little smidgen of
> it.  From a human performance perspective Word is a creator of mistakes and
> minor disasters.  It simply cannot provide the user with the information
> needed to create new complex documents easily and quickly.  The user can't
> see what is happening in the document infrastructure.  People with eidetic
> memory won't be affected much; however, that's about one in a million.
>
>         Several of my clients with major word processing departments tried
> to go to Word from WordPerfect and found that productivity dropped about 25%
> after the staff had become used to Word.  They all went back to WordPerfect.
> I should note that these people were all doing either legal or medical
> wordprocessing.
>
> Bernie
>
>
>
> At 01:03 PM 7/24/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >The reason Reveal Codes were a necessity in WP was because when you
> inserted them, IIRC, the only
> >clue that there was a code was block highlighting/underlining on the
> affected text.  In the instance
> >of FontSize, Reveal Codes was the ONLY way to determine this.
> >
> > In Word, these things are Visible to the naked eye, and there is no reason
> to have a separate
> >screen environment to display the cryptic representation of them.  OTTOMH,
> I can think of nothing in
> >Word that I can do with formatting or Font that isn't Patently visible to
> the casual observer.
> >
> > Remember, wherever your cursor is focusing in the document, the
> appropriate toolbar control [if
> >currently displayed] shows the status of the format at that location,
> notwithstanding the former,
> >that it is Visible.  Did I say Visible.  Yup. Visible.  ;-)
> >
> >Bernie, I started with EasyWriter in 1983, then WordStar, then to
> WP4-WP6.1, then Word97.  I
> >actually could do pretty much everything I needed to do to write a letter
> in EasyWriter, but
> >sometimes I need something more, and what suits me today is Word.   It just
> doesn't suit everyone
> >and that is great in my view.
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "Bernie Corrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:33 PM
> >Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Off topic
> >
> >
> >> What in the heck are you talking about?  TTBOMK THERE ARE NO REVEAL CODES IN
> >> WORD that are the equivalent of what is available in WP.  Through an
> >> extremely lengthy and tedious process you can look at what MicroBloat
> >> inserts in the huge doc files BUT YOU CAN'T MANIPULATE THOSE CODES OR DELETE
> >> THEM.  You can't even see them.  You can guess as to where they are, then
> >> click on Help > WordPerfect Help > (Scroll down) Reveal.  After all that
> >> Word will tell you what secret codes are right exactly where you have
> >> clicked on the document and nowhere else.  You have to go hunting around to
> >> find them.  In WP you simply hit Alt-F3 and there they are.  Right where
> >> they occur in the document.  You can see all of them.  ALL OF THEM.  AT THE
> >> SAME TIME.  You can move them.  You can delete them.
> >>
> >> Perhaps you can tell me how to do this in the same way in Word?  I'd love to
> >> know.
> >>
> >>
> >> At 11:04 AM 7/24/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >> >"Reveal Codes".  Check Words' Help>WordPerfect Help>Reveal Codes.  You will
> >> find there is no
> >> >difference between the two.  Word just does it differently.  I too was a
> >> "Wordperfect holdout"  up
> >> >to ver 6.1, but when it came to using its macro language, I switched
> >> quickly to the friendly VBA
> >> >environment (current WP uses VBA, not the old macro lang).  In Word, I can
> >> launch a template
> >> >document that includes VBA Code that connects to my RBase database, select
> >> one or a list of
> >> >recipients that the doc goes to and let'er rip.  No Merge list, etc.  I
> >> also was a DOS holdout,
> >> >dragged kicking and screaming to windows.  I don't look back(although I
> >> frequently open a command
> >> >window for some things that I can still do handily from there, but that is
> >> not typical of todays'
> >> >users).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >> >From: "Eric Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:47 PM
> >> >Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Off topic
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >That's like say you prefer to break bread with your hands rather than
> >> >using a knife.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Eric Peterson
> >> >IT Manager
> >> >QMI Security Solutions
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: Bernie Corrigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:41 PM
> >> >To: RBASE-L Mailing List
> >> >Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Off topic
> >> >
> >> >>And WordPerfect still has "reveal codes", the best feature ever in a
> >> >word
> >> >>processor.  Too bad Novell has no clue how to market itself.....
> >> >
> >> >WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS (circa 1990) is in many ways a better
> >> >wordprocessing
> >> >program than any version of M$ Word.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to