God here we go. PC rules Mac sucks I like Word but i cut my teeth on it. I love Excel Lotus sucks Access is weak Novel dropped the ball NT picked it up OS2 could have been great Linix is hard to use AOL is a joke Compuserve never got it VB is great DOS is dead Pegasus mail is the best What was the name of that other web browser oh ya Netscape Unreal is better then Quake but Half Life maybe one the best games ever Windows sucks until you try using something else Bill Gates is greedy but most of use would trade places with him Taxes are to high Government is to big Our kid's suck and are a bunch of losers. I just dont understand them I don't trust Bush God created the earth though evelution and is not done yet. Their is life on other plants
what ever, what ever, what ever On 24 Jul 2003 at 23:23, Alastair Burr wrote: > WordPad is fine for _most_ things - if you want to tart it up save as a .DOC > and then open in Word. > > Much quicker than opening Word for every document - if you don't need all > that pap. Most of my text document files (*.txt, *.fle, *.cmd) are > associated with WordPad in Windows. If I want to use another program I > can... > > Regards, > Alastair. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bob Castanaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 7:56 PM > Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Off topic > > > > >> OTTOMH, I can think of nothing in > > Word that I can do with formatting or Font that isn't Patently visible to > > the casual observer.<< > > > > Well, once you get trapped in some obscure table setup someone else has > > done, you will appreciate where exactly the cursor is in WP. > > > > I agree, both programs now have so much bloat for the casual user, it is > > mind boggling. I actually appreciate that MS put WordPad in > Windows....for > > my less PC literate clients and friends (many of whom are retired) this is > > all they need or want. > > > > C'mon, Mike - you've got to remember that you are a VB guru, miles ahead > of > > many of us, and continents ahead of an average user. Some of us are just > > simpletons wanting to put out a decent document as easy as possible > without > > a six month learning curve..... > > > > BC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "MikeB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/24/2003 02:03:57 PM > > > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (RBASE-L Mailing List) > > cc: (bcc: Bob Castanaro/BCH) > > Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Off topic > > > > > > > > > > The reason Reveal Codes were a necessity in WP was because when you > > inserted them, IIRC, the only > > clue that there was a code was block highlighting/underlining on the > > affected text. In the instance > > of FontSize, Reveal Codes was the ONLY way to determine this. > > > > In Word, these things are Visible to the naked eye, and there is no > reason > > to have a separate > > screen environment to display the cryptic representation of them. OTTOMH, > > I can think of nothing in > > Word that I can do with formatting or Font that isn't Patently visible to > > the casual observer. > > > > Remember, wherever your cursor is focusing in the document, the > > appropriate toolbar control [if > > currently displayed] shows the status of the format at that location, > > notwithstanding the former, > > that it is Visible. Did I say Visible. Yup. Visible. ;-) > > > > Bernie, I started with EasyWriter in 1983, then WordStar, then to > > WP4-WP6.1, then Word97. I > > actually could do pretty much everything I needed to do to write a letter > > in EasyWriter, but > > sometimes I need something more, and what suits me today is Word. It > just > > doesn't suit everyone > > and that is great in my view. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Bernie Corrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:33 PM > > Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Off topic > > > > > > > What in the heck are you talking about? TTBOMK THERE ARE NO REVEAL > CODES > > IN > > > WORD that are the equivalent of what is available in WP. Through an > > > extremely lengthy and tedious process you can look at what MicroBloat > > > inserts in the huge doc files BUT YOU CAN'T MANIPULATE THOSE CODES OR > > DELETE > > > THEM. You can't even see them. You can guess as to where they are, > then > > > click on Help > WordPerfect Help > (Scroll down) Reveal. After all that > > > Word will tell you what secret codes are right exactly where you have > > > clicked on the document and nowhere else. You have to go hunting around > > to > > > find them. In WP you simply hit Alt-F3 and there they are. Right where > > > they occur in the document. You can see all of them. ALL OF THEM. AT > > THE > > > SAME TIME. You can move them. You can delete them. > > > > > > Perhaps you can tell me how to do this in the same way in Word? I'd > love > > to > > > know. > > > > > > > > > At 11:04 AM 7/24/2003 -0500, you wrote: > > > >"Reveal Codes". Check Words' Help>WordPerfect Help>Reveal Codes. You > > will > > > find there is no > > > >difference between the two. Word just does it differently. I too was > a > > > "Wordperfect holdout" up > > > >to ver 6.1, but when it came to using its macro language, I switched > > > quickly to the friendly VBA > > > >environment (current WP uses VBA, not the old macro lang). In Word, I > > can > > > launch a template > > > >document that includes VBA Code that connects to my RBase database, > > select > > > one or a list of > > > >recipients that the doc goes to and let'er rip. No Merge list, etc. I > > > also was a DOS holdout, > > > >dragged kicking and screaming to windows. I don't look back(although I > > > frequently open a command > > > >window for some things that I can still do handily from there, but that > > is > > > not typical of todays' > > > >users). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: "Eric Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:47 PM > > > >Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Off topic > > > > > > > > > > > >That's like say you prefer to break bread with your hands rather than > > > >using a knife. > > > > > > > > > > > >Eric Peterson > > > >IT Manager > > > >QMI Security Solutions > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: Bernie Corrigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:41 PM > > > >To: RBASE-L Mailing List > > > >Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Off topic > > > > > > > >>And WordPerfect still has "reveal codes", the best feature ever in a > > > >word > > > >>processor. Too bad Novell has no clue how to market itself..... > > > > > > > >WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS (circa 1990) is in many ways a better > > > >wordprocessing > > > >program than any version of M$ Word. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Victor Timmons Tiz's Door Sales, Inc 425-258-2391
