> C'mon, Mike - you've got to remember that you are a VB guru

OK Bob. OK.  I give!  ;-)

But guru is a bit of a stretch.
I have a pretty good grip on it, but I wilt in the presence of a Real VB Guru, but I 
thank you for
your kind words anyway!





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Castanaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 1:56 PM
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Off topic


> >> OTTOMH, I can think of nothing in
> Word that I can do with formatting or Font that isn't Patently visible to
> the casual observer.<<
>
> Well, once you get trapped in some obscure table setup someone else has
> done, you will appreciate where exactly the cursor is in WP.
>
> I agree, both programs now have so much bloat for the casual user, it is
> mind boggling.  I actually appreciate that MS put WordPad in Windows....for
> my less PC literate clients and friends (many of whom are retired) this is
> all they need or want.
>
> C'mon, Mike - you've got to remember that you are a VB guru, miles ahead of
> many of us, and continents ahead of an average user.  Some of us are just
> simpletons wanting to put out a decent document as easy as possible without
> a six month learning curve.....
>
> BC
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "MikeB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/24/2003 02:03:57 PM
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (RBASE-L Mailing List)
> cc:    (bcc: Bob Castanaro/BCH)
> Subject:  [RBASE-L] - Re: Off topic
>
>
>
>
> The reason Reveal Codes were a necessity in WP was because when you
> inserted them, IIRC, the only
> clue that there was a code was block highlighting/underlining on the
> affected text.  In the instance
> of FontSize, Reveal Codes was the ONLY way to determine this.
>
>  In Word, these things are Visible to the naked eye, and there is no reason
> to have a separate
> screen environment to display the cryptic representation of them.  OTTOMH,
> I can think of nothing in
> Word that I can do with formatting or Font that isn't Patently visible to
> the casual observer.
>
>  Remember, wherever your cursor is focusing in the document, the
> appropriate toolbar control [if
> currently displayed] shows the status of the format at that location,
> notwithstanding the former,
> that it is Visible.  Did I say Visible.  Yup. Visible.  ;-)
>
> Bernie, I started with EasyWriter in 1983, then WordStar, then to
> WP4-WP6.1, then Word97.  I
> actually could do pretty much everything I needed to do to write a letter
> in EasyWriter, but
> sometimes I need something more, and what suits me today is Word.   It just
> doesn't suit everyone
> and that is great in my view.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bernie Corrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:33 PM
> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Off topic
>
>
> > What in the heck are you talking about?  TTBOMK THERE ARE NO REVEAL CODES
> IN
> > WORD that are the equivalent of what is available in WP.  Through an
> > extremely lengthy and tedious process you can look at what MicroBloat
> > inserts in the huge doc files BUT YOU CAN'T MANIPULATE THOSE CODES OR
> DELETE
> > THEM.  You can't even see them.  You can guess as to where they are, then
> > click on Help > WordPerfect Help > (Scroll down) Reveal.  After all that
> > Word will tell you what secret codes are right exactly where you have
> > clicked on the document and nowhere else.  You have to go hunting around
> to
> > find them.  In WP you simply hit Alt-F3 and there they are.  Right where
> > they occur in the document.  You can see all of them.  ALL OF THEM.  AT
> THE
> > SAME TIME.  You can move them.  You can delete them.
> >
> > Perhaps you can tell me how to do this in the same way in Word?  I'd love
> to
> > know.
> >
> >
> > At 11:04 AM 7/24/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> > >"Reveal Codes".  Check Words' Help>WordPerfect Help>Reveal Codes.  You
> will
> > find there is no
> > >difference between the two.  Word just does it differently.  I too was a
> > "Wordperfect holdout"  up
> > >to ver 6.1, but when it came to using its macro language, I switched
> > quickly to the friendly VBA
> > >environment (current WP uses VBA, not the old macro lang).  In Word, I
> can
> > launch a template
> > >document that includes VBA Code that connects to my RBase database,
> select
> > one or a list of
> > >recipients that the doc goes to and let'er rip.  No Merge list, etc.  I
> > also was a DOS holdout,
> > >dragged kicking and screaming to windows.  I don't look back(although I
> > frequently open a command
> > >window for some things that I can still do handily from there, but that
> is
> > not typical of todays'
> > >users).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Eric Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:47 PM
> > >Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Off topic
> > >
> > >
> > >That's like say you prefer to break bread with your hands rather than
> > >using a knife.
> > >
> > >
> > >Eric Peterson
> > >IT Manager
> > >QMI Security Solutions
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Bernie Corrigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:41 PM
> > >To: RBASE-L Mailing List
> > >Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Off topic
> > >
> > >>And WordPerfect still has "reveal codes", the best feature ever in a
> > >word
> > >>processor.  Too bad Novell has no clue how to market itself.....
> > >
> > >WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS (circa 1990) is in many ways a better
> > >wordprocessing
> > >program than any version of M$ Word.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to