Thanks Eric
Actally I belive you are right, but I still would like a temp solution that
can can give me the time I need to convert an old DOS R:Base to 7.0

Gunnar Ekblad


-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Fr�n: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] F�r Eric Peterson
Skickat: den 15 september 2003 15:03
Till: RBASE-L Mailing List
�mne: [RBASE-L] - Re: NTVDM

That is not a solution.  Furthermore, it doesn't work in the long run.


Eric Peterson
IT Manager
QMI Security Solutions
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Limburg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 6:55 AM
To: RBASE-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: NTVDM

Gunnar

I seem to remember something about someone on this list doing
just a plain zip cmd /c to regain memory, or something to
that effect. I will see if I can find the post.

Jim

Gunnar Ekblad wrote:
> Dennis
> I found this
> I use memoryblaster to view the memory (512MB and virtual set to 4000 MB)
> The memory usage never goes over 70%
> What I do in my 2 level while endwhile
> Run a report and then do
> Zip cmd /c copy filename.txt lpt5
> I have found out today that if in the loop I instead append the report to
> the file and just copy once at the end of the commandfile everything works
> without a NTVDM error
> So for time being my conclusion is that ZIP is the memory leak cause
> I will continue watching and testing If I find more I report
> 
> Gunnar Ekblad
> 
> 
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Fr�n: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] F�r Dennis McGrath
> Skickat: den 13 september 2003 14:25
> Till: RBASE-L Mailing List
> �mne: [RBASE-L] - Re: NTVDM
> 
> Gunnar,
> 
> As long as you are testing, run the report several time while watching
> memory usage with the task manager.  If you se the leak, try doing the
> same thing with rabase running under win98 compatibility mode and see
> if the memory leak is fixed.  Let us know what you find.
> 
> Dennis McGrath
> 
> --- Gunnar Ekblad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>J.M
>>I am not sure exactly but NTVDM is something like NT Virtual Dos
>>Machine
>>Mostly no problem, but a report running in 2 level deep while loop
>>sometimes
>>get stuck on XP maschine with an error on no available NTVDM memory,
>>while
>>it never happens on a ME PC (I had plan move that last PC to XP as
>>well so
>>all users run the same OS again, but don't dare yet)
>>The problem is not consistent after a reboot it normally works, this
>>is a
>>once a month problem for my monthly reporting. I always get the
>>report out
>>one way or an other, I just whish my user could do it herself month
>>after
>>month without asking me to fix the report out.
>>I will do some more testing on this in the weekend I report if I can
>>get the
>>problem to disappear.
>>Some more people claim there is some kind of memory leak problem in
>>XP with
>>R:Base dos 6.5++ latest and greatest 1.866
>>
>>As for uour problem the first I would test is RBW 1.866 before doing
>>anything else
>>
>>Gunnar Ekblad
>>
>>
>>-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
>>Fr�n: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] F�r J.M. GRATIAS
>>Skickat: den 12 september 2003 22:33
>>Till: RBASE-L Mailing List
>>�mne: [RBASE-L] - Re: NTVDM
>>
>>
>>Gunnar :
>>
>>
>>I am sure 98% of this
>>List would agree on that, but have you tried to explain it to a user
>>that
>>needs to do 4 extra reboots a day or "steal" a colleges ME.PC just to
>>get a
>>report out! 
>>So before I start going back in Time and start using ME/982E I would
>>like
>>to
>>find a solution or a workaround on the NTVDM error message
>><
>>
>>What means NTVDM ?
>>
>>Yesterday I visted a client that run one of my RBW 6.5++ app
>>(1.851xRT03)
>>on an old NT WS 128 Mo RAM without any problems.
>>
>>I asked my to move the same app on a brand new XP SP1 512 Mo RAM
>>..... and
>>there the problems begins (page fault, violation exception .....).
>>
>>
>>J.M. GRATIAS, Logimatique
>>
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to