I concur, Gunnar, unless there's some really good reason to do this segregation, it should all be integrated, as it were. Otherwise, it seems to me, it can result in a kind of "silo-ing" of information, which is not why we use the list.
Of course, maybe just a bit of sports and politics would be okay ... Steve in Memphis ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gunnar Ekblad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 11:13 AM Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: R:BASE 7.1 Online Manual Patrick (and Razzak) To me that means that the two list should become one where we can discuss anything from R:Base 4000 To 7.1 (forget about sports and politics). I understand that is RBTI's intention. My (and I guess Pats) opinion is now! Gunnar Ekblad -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Fr�n: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] F�r Patrick Murphy Skickat: den 11 februari 2004 17:50 Till: RBASE-L Mailing List �mne: [RBASE-L] - Re: R:BASE 7.1 Online Manual Thanks Razzak for that information. I just noticed that total messages here were about 4,800 last year vs. 8,000 in 2002, and I wondered if the "7.0 Only" user's list was getting more active at the expense of this mailing list? I'm somewhat at the mercy of my clients who have yet to commit to 7.0 despite my "suggestions"! Having access to on-going dialogs and ideas would be useful in that effort. Pat > . And most importantly, the company of fellow experienced > and new R:BASE 7.x Users and Developers from around the > world on the exclusive RBG7-L List. > > . Don't forget to register for 6th Annual R:BASE Developers' > Conference on May 21-24, 2004 to get your hands on more > productive tools and materials as well as attend technical > sessions. > > Razzak.
