Oh, Mike, I appreciate the implied something-about-me, but, to tell you the truth, I don't know if it's easy "to put into words how wonderful life is, while you'R:e in the world", with apologies to Elton John and Bernie Taupin and, perhaps, all of y'all as well as RBTI. Truly, the ridiculously short cycle-time for this fix is impressive.
It also causes me to have some thoughts/questions: - Had this problem ever been described/identified in ANY version? - (If not), the R:Team must be jam-up and jelly-tight on managing their code library ...? - My wife often says, "I'd rather be lucky than good." This is a fine philosophy, which she accepts but doesn't pursue, as it's certainly not a reliable strategy. However, even if by some confluence of variables within the Time-Space continuum, this fix was just one of those ultra-low-hangin' fruits, as it turned out, it's still WAY AWESOME, man! Hope that was sufficiently and appropriately superlative. ;-) Nice job, RBTI. Steve in Memphis -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MikeB Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 8:52pm 20:52 To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Database Limits, again? ----- Original Message ----- From: "A. Razzak Memon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 7:48 PM Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Database Limits, again? > At 06:50 PM 7/9/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Razzak: >> >>Thanks for fixing the problem! Who knows how far back this goes? > > > Amazing, isn't it? > Amazing doesn't quite describe it really... I don't think we can come up with superlatives (well probably Steve W. can ((-; ) to describe the extraordinary effort you guys make to drive the product to perfection. > You submitted the request and sent the file to R:DCC at > 5:33pm (Eastern Time) and the LEGACY problem was FIXED at > 6:15pm (Eastern Time) with a complimentary notification to > you as well. > > Razzak. >
