Larry:  I actually am creating the table with one long "create table" syntax. 
 It runs the statement without an error, actually creates the table with all 
747 columns, and you can query the sys_columns table and it shows all 747 
(until you attempt to insert data), so the command is working!    I was 
pleasantly 
surprised that a create table command could be that long!

Shorter column names would not be appropriate for me to use because since 
they are using the browser, with a limit of 18 characters it's already hard 
enough to differentiate a column that represents "Capsule Tissue Left Anterior" 
from "Capsule Tissue Left Inferior" !!!   Although for kicks I'll try it just 
to 
see if that's my problem.

I explained to the client what's holding me up, and she is going to ask her 
staff whether it's okay to split the table in half.  The tissue names will be 
in alphabetical order, so it could be AutopsyA_N  and AutopsyM_Z.  She said it 
was okay with her, but she's going to verify...

Karen

 
> How are you creating the table, by the way?  That many columns is too many 
> for a CREATE TABLE command -- it overflows the maximum command length.  Did 
> you try the experiment with shorter column names?
> 
> If you can't fix it, perhaps you could decompose it into two or three large, 
> but smaller than 750 columns, tables and let them work in "Autopsy Part I, 
> Autopsy Part 2, and Autopsy Part 3.
> --
   

Reply via email to