The one interesting thing I recall about Sybase was when Abacus was abandoning RBase (Should we refer to this era as B.R>.?). An RBase developer in Australia was urging everyone to switch to Sybase. He had arranged for what was claimed to be a very good deal from Sybase for all Rbase developers. What I found most intriguing was a claim he made that the languages and overall design of the products were extremely close, and so there would be a low learning curve. Does anyone remember seeing this information? I view this kind of stuff with great skepticism (one reason I don't have a copy of Sybase collecting dust in my office), but the idea of having a sort of Esperanto of databases (or a super-SQL, without lots of flavours), really intrigues me. I wonder how compatible the two products really are. How close are the languages? The systems? Dan
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder Dennis McGrath
- Re: RBase Vs Power Builder William Mason
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder David Ebert
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder Ben Johansen
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder Bernie Corrigan
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder Donald C.Burr
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder Ben Johansen
- Re: RBase Vs Power Builder William Mason
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder Donald C.Burr
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder Ben Johansen
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder Dan Weissmann
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder Ben Johansen
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder Donald C.Burr
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder Rommel Relosa
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder Dennis McGrath
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder Lawrence Lustig
- Re: RBase Vs Power Builder Mike Byerley
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder Donald C.Burr
- Re: RBase Vs Power Builder Ron Rose
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder Donald C.Burr
- RE: RBase Vs Power Builder A. Razzak Memon
