Just got B&M Toplight. I think the Supernova E3 rear light is also popular, but after some research the E3 is particular about comparability with front light, and I already got the B&M Eyc.
Also read that blinking rear lights, tend to mesmerize drunk drivers and drivers will be attracted to it, which is why constant lights are said to be the standard. Not sure if this is true or not, but not trying to take a chance experimenting...I'll report once I've used it for awhile On Sunday, June 21, 2015 at 4:30:22 PM UTC-4, Reid wrote: > > Starting this thread so as not to step on the new fender taillights > announcement. > > I've always had dynamo headlight taillight set ups on my bikes. At work > one time, another bike commuter was interested in dynamo lights, but was so > convinced that a flashing taillight (blinky) was the only safe way to go on > a bike, that he would not even consider a dynamo set up. His insistence > made enough of an impression on me, that I ended up adding a blinky to my > commute bikes. Just in case! > > Could a dynamo, with it's constant generation of juice, power a blinky > taillight or would that burn out the dynamo or the light? Is there some > technical limitation, or is "constant on" just "the way it's always been > done"? I would vote for a dynamo powered taillight that could be switched > from "constant on" to blinky. Does anyone have any data on this? > > Thanks for any info. > > Reid > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
