Steve, That fat bike is a good example of what I was trying to say. I suspect this may be a difference of _optimized_ for the fringe versus just _passable_ at the fringe. Expanding into the passable scope may not sacrifice the other end of the range as much as the optimized scope. But, the more you move from passable to optimized at one end, the greater the sacrifice at the other.
Tim On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Steve Palincsar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 03/22/2018 04:13 PM, Grant Petersen wrote: > > The point which I flopped in making is that a bike that "performs" at the > fringes can certainly handle the middle, but not necessarily the other way > around. I should have been more clear. > > > [image: Image result for fat bike] > > > Performs great at the fringe, but on the next 50 miler out in the > country...? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
