John, that's the item I have now, their Braemar smock, in red. 

Fluorescent colors in fabrics are a bit more susceptible to UV degradation 
of the pigments that produce the fluorescent color effect. The base fabric 
dictates the  necessity of chemical characteristics of a coloring dye, 
cotton is one of the hardest to accommodate. If interested: 
https://www.aatcc.org/media/Read/Newsletter/archive/2013/01A/The_Perils_and_Pitfalls_of_Dyeing_Neon_Colors.PDF

Back in my late '80s outdoor retail days, when fluorescent ("neon") colors 
ruled ski gear, we had a one day in the window policy for displays. They 
were rotated to even the exposure and the merchandisers had worksheets that 
were kept by the displays near the UV blocking windows because we observed 
fade from brief display in direct sunlight despite the glass choice, even 
non-fluorescent colors. 

In that same era Grant wrote in the 1991 Bridgestone catalog about color: 
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bridgestone/1991/pages/bridgestone-1991-17.htm

Andy Cheatham
Pittsburgh

On Thursday, August 30, 2018 at 12:19:14 AM UTC-4, John Bokman wrote:
>
> Thanks Patrick! 
> Interestingly, the 2x Ventile is the same weight as Cotton Analogy. I’d 
> rather buy all cotton “all things equal” unless there is a clear reason to 
> do otherwise. I like the smock option best, BTW. Less zipper, perhaps 
> slightly more cumbersome to put on, but the kangaroo pockets are a real 
> bonus for me. (I’d upset to the side zips, as well.) 
> > On Aug 29, 2018, at 9:12 PM, 'Deacon Patrick' via RBW Owners Bunch <
> rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > 
> > John, I’d recommend double ventile or cotton analogy for what you just 
> described. Single layer soaks through where horizontal, such as sleeves on 
> a bike, or sitting and enjoying a pipe. For blaze orange (or red, which I 
> prefer, because it is equally visible, but not flourescent and thus 
> bikey/racy and so people seem to be friendlier), I’d email them. 
> > 
> > With abandon, 
> > Patrick 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
> Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rbw-owners-bunch/Ajcfuk3Bwjs/unsubscribe. 
>
> > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. 
> > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com 
> <javascript:>. 
> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. 
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to