On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Steve Palincsar <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 09:24 -0600, PATRICK MOORE wrote: >> So the principal advantage, apart from the other one of fitting fatter >> tires into frames that will fit only very skinny 622 tires, is that >> you can find nicer 38mm+ tires in 584 than 32+ tires in 622? I know >> that that is certainly the case for 559 and 571 -- id est, that only >> the skinnies come with top quality, light and supple sidewalls, but I >> did not know that the same held for 622s as well. > > You can get top quality light and supple fast tires up to 32mm in 622, > beyond that you start getting into the sturdies and the cheapies. > > >
Okay I have to ask b/c I'm a little confused about this: 1. are the jack browns not considered a good 622? I rather like the greens so far. It took a bit of getting used to and trying out some random pressures, but I like them, now. 2. The pasela 35mm on my atlantis - non-tg/non-folding are rather nice, too. And I can't imagine a significantly cheaper tire, really. :) 3. I think various folks should definitely try out the panaracer t-serv. We've had them on the tandem for the last year or so and I've been pretty enamored of their feel. -sv -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
