One of the under-estimated parts of developing weapons systems is realistic testing. This is often a source of cost overruns and failed defense projects. A system that detects and identifies the priority threat in a complex threat-plus-background environment would require extensive testing that involves incremental levels of realism, with many iterations of test-redesign-test at each level. In this case I would think you would need many test sessions involving multiple tanks on the move, done at frequent intervals, not once or twice a year. So how likely is that to happen? Something to consider, if anyone is serious about this.
That being said, I think there is an opportunity to develop a sensor that could be used for this and many other applications. I'm thinking of a 3D imaging system, i.e. one that gives range per pixel as well as sufficiently high resolution 2D imagery to discriminate targets. Such sensors already exist in the form of scanning laser radars like the SICK, 3D flash ladars, and stereo imaging systems. They are prohibitively expensive. The challenge would be to reduce the cost to an affordable level. Theoretically this type of sensor could provide data to do all the required functions: detecting both stationary and moving objects, locating them, identifying them, tracking them, and tracking paintballs for closed loop fire control. The latter function is probably the most stressing for defining the sensor performance requirements. It would require a high level of illumination in a short pulse to freeze the paintball in flight, otherwise the image is blurred, and contrast is too low. It would be much simpler if you don't need closed loop control, but who knows? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
