Good choice!! Maybe you underestimate the effeciency of brush Esc now a day, because yes it can be crazy and unstable with 2 drive motors but if somebody would want to do prescise shooting, you sure can ajust the sensivity of your remote with a lot of exponential in the programe of the transmiter. I don't know if you know about that feature?
It make the smaller movement of the stick smooth and delicate and if you go pass the middle range it exponantially go more sensitive so you can be precise and super fast in the same time...?? But if you want to go dual diff go hahead I would realy love to see a macanical wounder like that work!! It's just that I love the simplicity of the twin motors!! Good luck with the paintball it sure will be easier to built a feeding system in an STrv since the gun is fix! Just remember that whatever tigth your aiming system is, paintball gun is not World of Tank, I realy doubt you will get that much more from paintball ammo(exept the fins maybe or first strike ammo) since if it would work it would be already in the market...!!! But never say never rigth!! Good lick and keep us posted! On Sat., Mar. 30, 2019, 7:12 p.m. ~D <[email protected]> wrote: > my plan now is to make an strv103 series,i wanted to know the viability of >> a dual diff because the control method for aiming will be alot easier that >> way. i plan on trying to improve the first shot accuracy with it vs whats >> been done already,things like smoother gun movement with less >> deadzone/wiggle,lower dispersion and better ranging/aiming using a few >> tricks ive seen from other hobbies/fields of engineering. i was hoping to >> use the tying tracks im just wondering about how they handle high torsion >> turning,like how an strv irl if the cannon hits a tree as its traversing,it >> will pivot and drag the whole vehicle on the axis of the obstruction to >> keep the gun traversing. plan on using a large motor for the drive and a >> smaller brushless motor geared down for the traverse,larger range of >> traverse speed, higher torque and better accuracy. the hydropnuematic >> suspension system i plan on (unfortunatly) faking with a linear actuator >> and some heavy duty linkages connected to the mounting points for the >> internal springs. later on once like you said,i get a working vehicle bare >> bones, i plan on adding a targeting camera hooked up with an arduino and a >> laser range finder,to give me a ballistic computer like the m60a3 >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PW0uRHKzXhM>.that is...if i can improve >> the shot grouping and effective range. i plan on making this my classic car >> of sorts. in the video games i play i tend to proffer long range extreme >> accuracy vs faster closer quarters as my reaction time is rather slow,hence >> the interest in the longest range recorded hit. the minimum size for tanks >> as i saw it on the rules here is 3 feet so i plan on having atleast an >> aftermarket extended barrel bringing it in scale with the real vehicle,i >> want to challenge myself with cramming all i want into such a small >> package. i plan on trying both fin stabilization and hopup like airsoft >> use.while the hopup would make it able to use unprepared ammunition it >> risks fouling the round. i plan on this taking maybe 2 years to get bare >> bones operational and total of 5 to get it all working as i want,though as >> any classic car owner knows...its never finished. > > > the A-40 is amazing X) have you seen the OBJ 740,OBJ 279? the soviets had > some awesome prototypes. has anyone thought of making an amphibious tank > and taking it to a field with say,a base on either side of a large > pond,with chokepoints on either side. something id love to look into later. > also possibly making a turreted vehicle with gun stabilization,as its not > that hard to add if the deadzone/wiggle is removed from the turrets > traverses.actually...i may put that on the maus when i make that some time > down the road...would allow firing on the move with a better than 0% chance > of hitting :) > > -- > -- > You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. > To post a message, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "R/C Tank Combat" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R/C Tank Combat" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
