I agree with Jenny and Deborah's responses, that Cathy's inclination to 
consider "Emergency traffic control for responders" as the title proper is the 
better way to go.  In evaluating title information, I try to take into account 
all presentations of the title(s) that are prominent on the resource, in order 
to determine which title is the "chief name" and which title is "subordinate".

This touches on one of my "favorite" cataloging pet peeves, which is the 
tendency of many catalogers to treat as "other title information" things that 
really should be seen as essential parts of the title proper.  For example, a 
catalog of an art exhibition held in London, with the title treated as:

$a Africa : $b the art of a continent

And the catalog the same exhibition held in New York is treated as:

                $a Africa : $b the art of a continent : 100 works of power and 
beauty

With only "Africa" as the title proper, the identification the work is severely 
limited.  This would be *much* more meaningful treated as:

                $a Africa, the art of a continent

                $a Africa, the art of a continent : $b 100 works of power and 
beauty

I think with the requirement in RDA to have distinct authorized access points 
for the work, we may have many catalogers coming to understand better the 
difference between title proper and other title information.  I would really 
hate to see this exhibition catalog given an AAP with just "Africa" which will 
then by necessity be qualified by a place, or a date, or a publisher, or the 
phrase "Exhibition catalog" or whatever--instead of just using simple title 
proper "Africa, the art of a continent"...

Kevin M. Randall
Principal Serials Cataloger
Northwestern University Library
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
(847) 491-2939

Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1978!

From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Crum, Cathy (KDLA)
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 7:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [RDA-L] RDA and the Title Proper

Hi all,

We are beginning to transition into original cataloging with RDA, but we have 
encountered a situation concerning the title proper and other title information.

The title as presented on the title page is:

Evaluation of pilot project:
Emergency traffic control for responders

In the light of RDA's "transcribe it as you see it" theme, how would you 
transcribe this title?  Would you transcribe all of the title as the title 
proper or is there a title proper and other title information?  I feel that 
"Emergency traffic control for responders" is the title proper, but its 
placement on the title page is problematic.  If the 2 title segments had been 
flipped in sequence, I think there would not have been much question about it.  
If you were to transcribe all of the title as the title proper, would you 
include the colon as well?

Any thoughts or advice would be greatly appreciated!

Cathy Crum

Cathy Crum
Cataloging Supervisor
State Library Services
Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


Reply via email to