As I understand it, and I could be wrong here.  In the description of the
item in hand, there are no spaces between initials, but in the authority
record there are.  This has been the common practice at least since AACR2
and I think it is in the NACO manual.


On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller <
wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de> wrote:

> I am puzzled by the treatment of initials in names of persons under RDA.
>
> According to AACR2, I believe there was never a space between two or more
> initials, regardless whether the initials appeared in the bibliographic
> description (e.g. in the statement of responsibility) or in a heading or
> reference. An example in 1.1.F4. reads "edited by P.C. Wason and P.N.
> Johnson-Laird", and one in 22.5A1. reads "Byatt, A.S.". So, the treatment
> was consistent.
>
> Now in RDA, initials in the bibliographic description are still
> transcribed without internal spaces, e.g. "edited by P.C. Wason and P.N.
> Johnson-Laird" (example in 1.7.6). Yet they are transcribed with spaces in
> preferred or variant names of persons, e.g.
> "Rowling, J. K." (example in 8.5.6.1).
>
> I find it difficult to understand why the rule was changed with respect to
> preferred/variant names only. Wouldn't it be much easier to apply the same
> custom in both cases?
>
> In Germany, we've always put spaces between initials in names of persons,
> regardless whether these appear in the bibliographic description or in
> headings/references. I think this is mainly due to matters of indexing.
> Many systems here simply ignore full stops in indexing. So without internal
> spaces we would end up with "PC" in the index instead of "P" and "C".
>
> Heidrun
>
>
> --
> ---------------------
> Prof. Heidrun Wiesenmueller M.A.
> Stuttgart Media University
> Faculty of Information and Communication
> Wolframstr. 32, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany
> www.hdm-stuttgart.de/bi
>



-- 
Gene Fieg
Cataloger/Serials Librarian
Claremont School of Theology
gf...@cst.edu

Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Lincoln University do not
represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information
or content contained in this forwarded email.  The forwarded email is that
of the original sender and does not represent the views of Claremont School
of Theology or Claremont Lincoln University.  It has been forwarded as a
courtesy for information only.

Reply via email to