Wouldn't these discussions be on the JSC website? On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Jack Wu <j...@franciscan.edu> wrote:
> While unrelated to this particular inquiry, I'm ashamed to admit, > while up to date on other messages on this list, I can't say the same for > the JSC working documents.They frequently got left behind, not because of > their lack of importance, but most got left behind for another day which > never comes, on account of more mundane, but immediate cataloging matters. > So my general question is. Is there another way to keep up with the > changes? RDA Toolkit seems little help unless you read the entire kit every > so often, clearly not practical. Discussions on this list seem to be the > next best alternative. Is there a summary every so often of changes of any > consequence that one should be aware of? > > Jack > > Jack Wu > Franciscan University of Steubenville > j...@franciscan.edu > > > >>> "Danskin, Alan" <alan.dans...@bl.uk> 10/21/2013 5:08 AM >>> > > Dear Yan,**** > > ** ** > > I will take the liberty of stepping in and responding to this, as Judy may > not be aware of the background to your enquiry.**** > > ** ** > > The issue you refer to was one of several identified by the Technical > Group on the adoption of RDA in France. Many of the issues identified by > this group were discussed by EURIG (the European RDA Interest Group) at the > EURIG Technical Meeting, hosted by BNF, in Paris on 27 January 2012.**** > > ** ** > > There was a consensus at the meeting that it would be desirable for RDA to > provide alternative instructions that would not mandate any particular > order of elements when constructing an access point. However, EURIG has > not prioritised this work and no proposal has been put to JSC and none is > currently planned.**** > > ** ** > > Kind regards,**** > > ** ** > > Alan**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Alan Danskin**** > > Vice-Chair EURIG**** > > British Library Representative to JSC**** > > British Library**** > > Boston Spa**** > > Wetherby**** > > West Yorkshire**** > > LS23 7BY**** > > ** ** > > Tel: +44(0)1937 546669**** > > mobile: 07833401117**** > > ** ** > > **** > > ** ** > > *From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access > [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Yan Lee > *Sent:* 21 October 2013 05:20 > *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > *Subject:* [RDA-L] Proposal to RDA 5.1.4 by EURIG**** > > ** ** > > Dear Judy Kuhagen,**** > > May I know what's going on about the proposal to RDA 5.1.4 by EURIG? Is > there any discussion paper on this?**** > > Proposal: No fixed order should be imposed upon the combination of an > author’s name and the title of a Work. (RDA issues for discussion by EURIG, > January 16, 2012)**** > > Thanks.**** > > Best Regards,**** > > Yan**** > > ** ** > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:19 PM, JSC Secretary < > jscsecret...@rdatoolkit.org> wrote:**** > > The discussion paper listed below for the November 2013 JSC meeting is > available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html); > written responses are not required. > > 6JSC/Chair/9 [Element Set Discussion ("Notes on", "Details of", Source > Consulted", etc.)] > > **** > > Regards, Judy Kuhagen**** > > JSC Secretary**** > > > > > -- > Yan Yi Lee > Systems Librarian > Wagner College Library > (718) 420-4219 **** > > ------------------------------ > Scanned by for virus, malware and spam by SCM appliance > > -- Gene Fieg Claremont School of Theology gf...@cst.edu Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Lincoln University do not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information or content contained in this forwarded email. The forwarded email is that of the original sender and does not represent the views of Claremont School of Theology or Claremont Lincoln University. It has been forwarded as a courtesy for information only.
