On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:45 AM, John Cowan <co...@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit: > >> With cdata we'd need to watch that no ]]> is in sweet lisp. > > Sweet-expressions don't use square brackets for anything. >
Not quite. Neoteric defines "[ x ]" to mean exactly the same thing in your base Lisp as it normally does (e.g. "( x )" in R6RS, "(fn (_) x)" in Arc). Also, Neoteric redefines "foo[ x ]" to mean "($bracket-apply$ foo x)". Still, the character sequence "]]>" is highly unlikely in Sweet. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes. www.restlet.com/download http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
