I think that all of us will pay with pleasure for a version with an optimized compiler and bugs fixed, despite to that they should give this type of updates ( at least the bug fixes one) for free.
Perhaps if they don't see our point of view is because they don't use RB all the time ;) 2006/2/20, Thomas Tempelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Another way might be to convince RS to shift their priorities. E.g, > it appears that, like most companies, RS thinks that they can only > sell new versions of they offer "new, great" features. But perhaps > they'll make a much better sale if they only improve code speed and > size in one version? Who knows? I don't know how to assess this, > but if someone has an idea... -- un saludo Dario Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
