On 11 Apr 2006, at 16:50, Peter De Berdt wrote:
Nope, it's not a prime :-) http://primes.utm.edu/notes/faq/one.html Google is your friend in these cases... Best regards Peter De Berdt
"So indeed there was a time that many folks defined one to be a prime, but it is the importance of units in modern mathematics that causes us to be much more careful with the number one (and with primes)."
I guess I'm older than I thought! :) All the best, Mark. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
