On Jun 02, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Stefan Pantke wrote:
Am 03.06.2006 um 00:14 schrieb Stefan Pantke:
Am 02.06.2006 um 06:57 schrieb Peter K. Stys:
the problem with upgrading and trying for yourself is this:
you'll do
fine with simple projects while getting the feel for the new
compiler,
and in fact I very much like the look-and-feel of RB2006.
Seems to be true for me too. The IDE is still unfriendly:
Let's look at activity monitor and check things: CPU load 95% of
both CoreDuo Cores.
RB takes 593 MByte of real memory and 'just' __1,14 GByte__ of
virtual memory.
And check out how much RAM translated takes up
Probably more and often CPU usage is very low but because translated
takes up so much RAM you swap like crazy.
Things get memory starved; or seem to.
So it's not entirely RB's fault.
Rosetta is memory hog too
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
