I can answer the below question:
stable:
We have been running the server in-house for close to 8 months and it
has been very stable. The acid test is to have it on a client site
and we installed it at our client beta site in April and... It has
been running ever since.
fast:
Our client site has 8 users who beat on the database 8 hours a day,
5-6 days a week. 1 database, 24 tables, several thousand rows in many
of the tables. No speed issues so far.
Before we choose the REALSQLServer as our back-end database, we did
some testing in house. We crafted a 'bot' to insert, select update
for an extended period of time. After a week and several hundred
thousand rows across multiple tables, we timed selects, inserts and
updates compared to the time when it started. No significant
differences.
reliable:
Our clients are very happy with the overall reliability: As I
mentioned above, our RB app (client/server model) plus the
REALSQLServer has been running since April.
We tested and worked with all of the available databases (free,
licensed or pay) and bang for the buck, it's the best solution in our
opinion.
The integration into RB is well supported and we like the idea that
our chosen development environment and database are created by the
same company - gives us a single point of contact for support.
Jay Wooten, President
Go Data Systems, Inc.
www.godatasystems.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 4, 2006, at 11:33 AM, Marco Bambini wrote:
On Sep 4, 2006, at 5:14 PM, Eric Ferrer wrote:
Hello all,
I've just had the chance to give a try to REALSQLServer.
My first impressions are really good.
But both the product and my experience of it are (very) recent.
That's why I would like to known how stable/fast/reliable this
server is.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
