> Is there a standard way to write the installion program in RB or 
> 
> I've seen programs using "InstallShield", which is another 
> scripting language you have to learn?
> 
> What about RPM from Linux?  What is the best way to do this?

There isnt a standard way to write an installer in RB, but all the Windows
tools you already use are still available. There is two commercial
installers made with REALbasic that I know of - Install Factory and
Meshinstall.

There are also a handful of free installers out there. If money is more
precious than time, free is always a good price :-)

Best regards,

Lynn Fredricks
President
Paradigma Software, Inc

Joining Worlds of Information

Deploy True Client-Server Database Solutions
Royalty Free with Valentina Developer Network
http://www.paradigmasoft.com







> Long
> 
> --- Lynn Fredricks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> > >    I don't understand why you have to develop a
> > separate
> > >    installer program for your programs for
> > distributing
> > >    them on M$ Windozzz?
> > >   ...
> > > 
> > > Because programs for Windows that _aren't_ made in
> > RB tend to
> > > splatter themselves all over the system.  Users
> > have come to
> > > expect installers.
> > > 
> > > When talking with clients who want Windows
> > development done
> > > (in RB), I have to spend a lot of time explaining
> > how simple
> > > an RB installation is.  It's easier just to wrap
> > your
> > > exectuable in a simple installer than to worry
> > about it.
> > 
> > Installers are the norm on Windows - it doesn't matter if a 
> REALbasic 
> > app is a single executable - its all about user expectations.
> > 
> > Craig, I know you didn't write the original post (so Im not 
> slamming 
> > you
> > :-)) with saying this, but when I see "M$ Windozzz"
> > on a list about
> > REALbasic it really sends the wrong message about development with 
> > REALbasic
> > - like RB developers only know about the Mac.
> > 
> > If you begin on the Mac and deploy to Windows, you should deploy an 
> > app that looks and acts like a Windows app and not an ugly 
> Mac port. 
> > And Mac conventions on Windows look as ugly as Windows conventions 
> > look on the Mac.
> > A lot of "classic" Mac companies during the 90's learned to their 
> > detriment that they had to ship a real Windows product if they 
> > expected to get taken seriously (and acquire new customers).
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > Lynn Fredricks
> > President
> > Paradigma Software, Inc
> > 
> > Joining Worlds of Information
> > 
> > Deploy True Client-Server Database Solutions Royalty Free with 
> > Valentina Developer Network http://www.paradigmasoft.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
> > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
> > 
> > Search the archives of this list here:
> >
> <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
> <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
> 
> Search the archives of this list here:
> <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
> 


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to