At 4:40 PM -0400 10/6/06, Mike Woodworth wrote:
you could use ubound as the upper bounds for your loops and item(0) and it would work like a 0 based array, or use count and skip item(0) as we are supposed to now, and use it as a 1 based array
Yes,this is a very clever proposal up to the point where you've added Ubound and Item(0) wraps around to the highest item.
However I strongly disagree with the proposal to eventually remove the .Count and highest Item capabilities.
Regards, Joe Huber _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
