On Oct 6, 2006, at 4:42 PM, Joe Huber wrote:
At 4:40 PM -0400 10/6/06, Mike Woodworth wrote:
you could use ubound as the upper bounds for your loops and item(0)
and it would work like a 0 based array, or use count and skip item
(0) as we are supposed to now, and use it as a 1 based array
Yes,this is a very clever proposal up to the point where you've
added Ubound and Item(0) wraps around to the highest item.
It sounds like what people would like is a method like:
FolderItem.Items() As FolderItem()
which would return all the children of that item.
-Jon
--
Jonathan Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REAL Software, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
